From: | Ian Linwood <ian(at)dinwoodi(dot)plus(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: How to make a REALLY FAST db server? |
Date: | 2001-09-11 11:17:59 |
Message-ID: | 9urrptosorr0vsf9d9bdnbjdbl4p6vumva@4ax.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 21:14:33 +0000 (UTC), teg(at)redhat(dot)com (Trond Eivind
Glomsrød) wrote:
>> - Hardware: dual / quad Intel class
>
>Athlon gives more bang for the buck - the dual Athlons are _really_
>nice, and have proven stable as well.
>
Agreed, single Athlons are much better than single Intels, but I still
think Intel win in the SMP game. As for stability, I think it's a tad
too early to make such a statement.
>> - Disk: SCSI Raid 1+0
>
>I'd probably go for a 3ware RAID instead... IDE disks are so much
>cheaper nowadays than SCSI, and the premium isn't really justifiable
>anymore.
>
Aargh, No! SCSI is MUCH better under load and more reliable. I've yet
to see an enterprise server utilise IDE raid.
>> - OS: Prolly FreeBSD (FFS is your friend (what with syncs and all) and it
>> can do multi proc support
>
>I'd recommend Linux, which has more mature MP support and scales
>better, but I'm obviously biased :). It's of course very important to
>keep what you are familiar with - a good sysadmin makes a world of
>difference no matter what you're using.
I'd recommend Solaris, which has MUCH more mature MP support!
Linux still has a way to go (although it's getting there very
quickly).
If you do decide to use Linux, check out ReiserFS file system.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tille, Andreas | 2001-09-11 11:56:16 | Re: Performance question |
Previous Message | J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) | 2001-09-11 11:10:32 | Re: a plpgsql documentation and samples |