Re: Sourceforge on Oracle? (WAY OT)

From: J Smith <dark_panda(at)hushmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Sourceforge on Oracle? (WAY OT)
Date: 2001-11-15 19:33:51
Message-ID: 9t15g2$26v0$1@news.tht.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


My bad I guess, although they did move it from where it was normally found.
I didn't see any notices about the move or anything, and I had heard
several people come to the same sort of conclusion.

That aside, I'll still be a little miffed if they go with Oracle on their
actual web site. (I'm not overly concerned about the commercial "Enterprise
Edition" or whatever it's called.) It just seems so... wrong. "Hey, we're
pillars of open source/free software, but that doesn't mean we actually
have to use it."

Whatever. Hopefully they'll stick with free software (hopefully PgSQL, but
hell, I'd rather see any OSS/FS database up there over Oracle or MS SQL.

J

Justin Clift wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> Looks like we were wrong. They've still got the SF Alexandria code
> online, it's just been moved to a different project :
>
> http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=123589
>
> :-)
>
> Regards and best wishes,
>
> Justin Clift
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message wsheldah 2001-11-15 19:34:59 Re: Idle in transaction ????
Previous Message Andrew G. Hammond 2001-11-15 19:32:47 Re: Serial data type not starting at 1