| From: | "Jeff Boes" <jboes(at)nexcerpt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Timestamp indexes aren't used for ">=" |
| Date: | 2001-11-12 13:53:58 |
| Message-ID: | 9sok6l$ek7$1@news.tht.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
In article <20011109145054(dot)H59285-100000(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>,
"Stephan Szabo" <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> wrote:
> How many rows are in the table? Have you run vacuum analyze?
Sorry, that information was in the original post, but perhaps you missed
it:
In article <9shhnf$23ks$1(at)news(dot)tht(dot)net>, "Jeff Boes" <jboes(at)nexcerpt(dot)com>
wrote:
> We have a table which has approximately 400,000 rows. It has 17 columns,
> and 4 indexes. The primary key is a int4 (filled by a sequence),
> additionally we have two more int4 indexes and a timestamp index.
Yes, VACUUM ANALYZE gets run every 24 hours, and currently the table
grows by some 25K-40K rows per day. Could a factor be the time elapsed
between the VACUUM and the query?
--
Jeff Boes vox 616.226.9550
Database Engineer fax 616.349.9076
Nexcerpt, Inc. jboes(at)nexcerpt(dot)com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nick Fankhauser | 2001-11-12 14:00:10 | Re: to many connection |
| Previous Message | Fabio Serra | 2001-11-12 09:46:02 | Which ODBC ? |