From: | "Sushant Sinha" <sushant354(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Oleg Bartunov" <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> |
Cc: | "Teodor Sigaev" <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, "Pierre-Yves Strub" <pierre(dot)yves(dot)strub(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Pgsql Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] Fragments in tsearch2 headline |
Date: | 2008-07-23 16:17:26 |
Message-ID: | 9fb559330807230917h19b61057p3d5fb59601fd9522@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
I guess it is more readable to add cover separator at the end of a fragment
than in the front. Let me know what you think and I can update it.
I think the right place for cover separator is in the structure
HeadlineParsedText just like startsel and stopsel. This will enable users to
specify their own cover separators. But this will require changes to the
structure as well as to the generateHeadline function. This option will not
also play well with the default headline generation function.
The default MaxWords = 35 seems a bit high for this headline generation
function and 20 seems to be more reasonable. Any thoughts?
-Sushant.
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 7:44 AM, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> wrote:
> btw, is it intentional to have '....' in headline ?
>
> =# select ts_headline('1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 1','1&4'::tsquery,'MaxFragments=1');
> ts_headline
> -------------------------
> ... <b>4</b> 5 <b>1</b>
>
>
>
> Oleg
>
> On Wed, 23 Jul 2008, Teodor Sigaev wrote:
>
> Let me know of any other changes that are needed.
>>>
>>
>> Looks like ready to commit, but documentation is needed.
>>
>>
>>
> Regards,
> Oleg
> _____________________________________________________________
> Oleg Bartunov, Research Scientist, Head of AstroNet (www.astronet.ru)
> Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University, Russia
> Internet: oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/<http://www.sai.msu.su/%7Emegera/>
> phone: +007(495)939-16-83, +007(495)939-23-83
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-07-23 16:40:33 | Re: Any way to favor index scans, but not bitmap index scans? |
Previous Message | Shane Ambler | 2008-07-23 16:00:12 | Re: A couple of newbie questions ... |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-07-23 16:38:47 | Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-07-23 16:05:36 | Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements |