| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Victor Wagner <vitus(at)wagner(dot)pp(dot)ru>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Patch: Implement failover on libpq connect level. |
| Date: | 2016-10-24 20:10:32 |
| Message-ID: | 9f4f66aa-e064-f69a-5323-fe8ff2006af6@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
On 10/24/16 6:36 AM, Thom Brown wrote:
> So should it be the case that it disallows UNIX socket addresses
> entirely? I can't imagine a list of UNIX socket addresses being that
> useful.
But maybe a mixed list of Unix-domain sockets and TCP connections?
The nice thing is that is it currently transparent and you don't have to
wonder.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2016-10-24 20:15:41 | Re: Patch: Implement failover on libpq connect level. |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2016-10-24 20:04:24 | Re: Rename max_parallel_degree? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2016-10-24 20:15:41 | Re: Patch: Implement failover on libpq connect level. |
| Previous Message | Victor Wagner | 2016-10-24 19:38:57 | Re: Patch: Implement failover on libpq connect level. |