From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: SCRAM in the PG 10 release notes |
Date: | 2017-09-21 14:51:32 |
Message-ID: | 9f0f19a6-e431-0045-3541-644ad385aeb2@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 9/20/17 15:52, Jeff Janes wrote:
> I think that the addition of a link to
> > https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/List_of_drivers
> <https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/List_of_drivers> would be appropriate.
>
> I don't have any expectation that that list will be kept up to date.
>
> I am not confident that it will be either, but what could we ever have
> more confidence in being kept up-to-date than something anyone can
> update which is hosted on a community asset?
If we put such a list linked from the documentation, we have to keep it
up to date for years, and no one is committing to do that.
I don't think it's our job to maintain lists of which third-party
products are ready to take advantage of new features in PostgreSQL. I
don't see a list of GUIs ready to work with the new partitioning or
monitoring tools ready to work with the new xlog/wal naming. If some
folks want to maintain such lists, that's great, but it's not a release
issue.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2017-09-21 15:05:38 | Re: SCRAM in the PG 10 release notes |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-09-21 14:42:09 | Re: SCRAM in the PG 10 release notes |