Re: Python 3.11 vs. Postgres

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Python 3.11 vs. Postgres
Date: 2021-11-24 07:24:52
Message-ID: 9f0a00b3-02a5-4a69-44c1-f59d3cd5121a@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 24.11.21 04:07, Tom Lane wrote:
> According to [1], we need to stop including Python's <eval.h>.
> I've not checked whether this creates any backwards-compatibility
> issues.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2023272

See attached patch. The minimum Python version for this change is 2.4,
which is the oldest version supported by PG10, so we can backpatch this
to all live branches.

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Remove-unneeded-Python-includes.patch text/plain 893 bytes

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2021-11-24 07:40:56 Re: Mop-up from Test::More version change patch
Previous Message Laurenz Albe 2021-11-24 07:17:14 Re: Sequence's value can be rollback after a crashed recovery.