Re: Possible bug in PostgreSQL 8.3beta4 (postgres process segfaults)

From: "Lawrence Oluyede" <l(dot)oluyede(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Possible bug in PostgreSQL 8.3beta4 (postgres process segfaults)
Date: 2008-01-27 13:38:18
Message-ID: 9eebf5740801270538x71242107v969391d06df6d2c4@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> I think we finally found the problem. Please see if things are more
> stable with 8.3RC1 plus this patch:
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2008-01/msg00190.php

Sorry for being so late. I'm currently using PostgreSQL RC2 at work
and I notice no crashes.
Thanks!

--
Lawrence, stacktrace.it - oluyede.org - neropercaso.it
"It is difficult to get a man to understand
something when his salary depends on not
understanding it" - Upton Sinclair

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Phil Rhoades 2008-01-27 14:05:39 A select DISTINCT query?
Previous Message Shane Ambler 2008-01-27 13:05:59 Re: Very long execution time of "select nextval('..');"