From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: GUC names in messages |
Date: | 2023-12-08 14:48:43 |
Message-ID: | 9e7802b2-2cf2-4c2d-b680-b2ccb9db1d2f@eisentraut.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 08.12.23 05:10, Peter Smith wrote:
> Patch 0001 -- "datestyle" becomes DateStyle in messages
> Rebased this again, which was part of an earlier patch set
> - I think any GUC names documented as MixedCase should keep that same
> case in messages; this also obeys the guidelines recently pushed [1].
> - Some others agreed, expecting the exact GUC name (in the message)
> can be found in pg_settings [2].
> - OTOH, Michael didn't like the diff churn [3] caused by this patch.
I'm fine with adjusting the mixed-case stuff, but intuitively, I don't
think removing the quotes in this is an improvement:
- GUC_check_errdetail("Conflicting \"datestyle\" specifications.");
+ GUC_check_errdetail("Conflicting DateStyle specifications.");
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2023-12-08 15:05:09 | Re: backtrace_on_internal_error |
Previous Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2023-12-08 14:06:38 | Re: Memory consumed by paths during partitionwise join planning |