Re: Interesting case of IMMUTABLE significantly hurting performance

From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Nico Williams <nico(at)cryptonector(dot)com>, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>, Olleg Samoylov <splarv(at)ya(dot)ru>, "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Interesting case of IMMUTABLE significantly hurting performance
Date: 2025-04-11 05:15:44
Message-ID: 9e5296eaa15b8f531a8e1190bca3f98cffa3262d.camel@cybertec.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, 2025-04-10 at 22:18 -0500, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> Facts.  This is black magic.   This has come up over and over. 

Perhaps it would help to add the excellent information from the Wiki to the documentation:
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Inlining_of_SQL_functions

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nico Williams 2025-04-11 05:30:38 Re: Interesting case of IMMUTABLE significantly hurting performance
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2025-04-11 04:13:37 Re: Interesting case of IMMUTABLE significantly hurting performance