Re: request for feature: psql 'DSN' option

From: "hubert depesz lubaczewski" <depesz(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: request for feature: psql 'DSN' option
Date: 2006-07-08 11:35:42
Message-ID: 9e4684ce0607080435y38da7141l9cea68e0d05ff6e4@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 7/7/06, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>
> Why is this better than using the service file?
>

service file is not well described in manual. quick grep showed that we have
PGSERVICE variable, and pg_service.conf.sample, which doesn't even include
all possible parameter names.
and - comments in this file suggest it is to be used globally only: "Copy
this to your sysconf directory (typically /usr/local/pgsql/etc) and...", and
not "per user".
i would really love to see pg_service.conf extended in such a way that i
could:
1. store it in $HOME/.pg_service.conf
2. use name of service on psql invocation (not as env variable). preferably
using psql service_name. this will conflict with current behaviour (treating
argument as dbname), but with some basic logic, i belive it can be done.

just my $0.02.

depesz

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Diogo Biazus 2006-07-08 18:50:56 Re: xlog viewer prototype and new proposal
Previous Message Greg Stark 2006-07-08 04:21:27 Re: DISTINCT/Optimizer question