From: | "hubert depesz lubaczewski" <depesz(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Richard Huxton" <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL General" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: corrupted item pointer:??? |
Date: | 2006-04-14 08:49:39 |
Message-ID: | 9e4684ce0604140149u1703fd96r8a316fbf4fc4332c@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 4/13/06, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> "hubert depesz lubaczewski" <depesz(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On 4/13/06, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >> AFAICS, the only non-index-related occurrence of that error message
> >> is in PageRepairFragmentation, which is invoked by VACUUM. I'd say
> >> it indicates a real problem and you shouldn't ignore it. You might
> >> try using pg_filedump or some such to examine the table and see if
> >> there's anything obvious about what happened to the corrupted page.
> > i'm not familiar with this utility.
> http://sources.redhat.com/rhdb/
> > i can of course find it using google, but how do i check what is wrong?
> pg_filedump will complain about a bad item pointer (looks like the
> message will be something about "Error: Item contents extend beyond
> block")
> > i am even willing to upload the dump file, but with 4 milion records in
> > table, it is going to be rather large...
> I don't think we want to see the whole thing! But "pg_filedump -i -f"
> output would be interesting for the specific block(s) that pg_filedump
> reports errors for.
>
if i understand correctly i have to do pg_filedump <relfilenode> of table,
check output for errors, and make pg_filedump -i -f of problematic blocks.
if that's ok - i'm running it.
as soon as i have some info - i'll let you know.
depesz
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | hubert depesz lubaczewski | 2006-04-14 08:56:21 | Re: corrupted item pointer:??? |
Previous Message | pgdb | 2006-04-14 07:45:15 | Re: Regex with patterns in table field |