| From: | hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Saranya Sivakumar <sarlavk(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsqlperform <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: System Requirement |
| Date: | 2005-06-14 08:32:06 |
| Message-ID: | 9e4684ce050614013232f9dbbd@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On 6/13/05, Saranya Sivakumar <sarlavk(at)yahoo(dot)com> wrote:
> 2 x 2.4 Ghz Intel Xeon CPU with HT(4 virtual CPUs)
switch to amd opteron (dual cpu). for the same price you get 2x
performance - comparing to xeon boxes.
> RAM - 1GB
you'd definitelly could use more ram. the more the better.
> HDD - 34GB SCSI
is it one drive of 34G? if yes, buy another one and setup raid1 over
them. should boost performance as well.
> Production DB size: 10.89 GB
not much. you could even consider buing 12 or 16g of ram to make it
fit in memory.
depesz
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Saranya Sivakumar | 2005-06-14 13:04:20 | Re: System Requirement |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2005-06-14 01:29:28 | Re: Updates on large tables are extremely slow |