From: | "Ericson Smith" <esconsult1(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Postgresql over a SAN |
Date: | 2007-07-26 12:55:58 |
Message-ID: | 9dd2faa40707260555g222a345dn690eabbff4c0ba8f@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
At one point I used a SAN with a 380GB postgresql database. There were
no issues.
Great benefit? We were able to keep a hot standby servers in case the
main server went down. In that case we would just shutdown the primary
server, and start the standby one.
- Ericson Smith
W3matter LLC
http://www.w3matter.com
On 7/26/07, Albe Laurenz <all(at)adv(dot)magwien(dot)gv(dot)at> wrote:
> Denis Gasparin wrote:
> > We're evaluating to install a SAN (Storage Area Network) and to use it
> > as storage area for our Postgresql server.
> >
> > Did anybody already make this? Problems, performance issues, tips?
>
> We use a SAN with HP EVA boxes for our PostgreSQL servers and we have
> not encountered any irregularities so far. None of our databases
> are very big or under heavy load though.
>
> Yours,
> Laurenz Albe
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Geoffrey | 2007-07-26 13:16:25 | Re: upgrade to 8.2.? or implement Slony, which first? |
Previous Message | Albe Laurenz | 2007-07-26 11:45:20 | Re: Postgresql over a SAN |