Re: 2024-05-09 release announcement draft

From: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 2024-05-09 release announcement draft
Date: 2024-05-08 16:17:13
Message-ID: 9d1bf0e0-bdcc-461b-8f76-4e14aa9c8caf@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 5/7/24 12:16 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Why not "Fix INSERT with multi-row VALUES clauses ..."?
>
> To my mind, the VALUES clause is the data source for INSERT,
> so "from" seems appropriate. I'm not going to argue hard
> about it.

OK, so I've read through this a few times and have sufficiently confused
myself. So, how about this:

* Fix how
[`INSERT`](https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sql-insert.html)
handles multiple
[`VALUES`](https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sql-values.html) rows
into a target column that is a domain over an array or composite type.

Thanks,

Jonathan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Imseih (AWS), Sami 2024-05-08 17:30:44 Re: New GUC autovacuum_max_threshold ?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2024-05-08 15:51:17 Re: Fix for recursive plpython triggers