| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josef Šimánek <josef(dot)simanek(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Initial progress reporting for COPY command |
| Date: | 2020-06-15 04:38:57 |
| Message-ID: | 9d0d0fcb-b9bb-584e-3151-0d45c868a684@oss.nttdata.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020/06/14 21:32, Josef Šimánek wrote:
> Hello, as proposed by Pavel Stěhule and discussed on local czech PostgreSQL maillist (https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/postgresql-cz/CAFj8pRCZ42CBCa1bPHr7htffSV%2BNAcgcHHG0dVqOog4bsu2LFw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer) I have prepared an initial patch for COPY command progress reporting.
Sounds nice!
> file - bool - is file is used?
> program - bool - is program used?
Are these fields really necessary in a progress view?
What values are reported when STDOUT/STDIN is specified in COPY command?
> file_bytes_processed - amount of bytes processed when file is used (otherwise 0), works for both direction (
> FROM/TO) when file is used (file = t)
What value is reported when STDOUT/STDIN is specified in COPY command?
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2020-06-15 04:42:25 | Re: Review for GetWALAvailability() |
| Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2020-06-15 04:30:58 | Re: vacuum verbose: show pages marked allvisible/frozen/hintbits |