| From: | "Sergey E(dot) Volkov" <sve(at)raiden(dot)bancorp(dot)ru> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: WAL feature |
| Date: | 2001-04-28 08:59:42 |
| Message-ID: | 9ce0vq$qe5$1@news.tht.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
What about incremental backup ?
"Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> /
: news:200104272103(dot)f3RL3ur23234(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us(dot)(dot)(dot)
>
> WAL was a difficult feature to add to 7.1. Currently, it is only used
> as a performance benefit, but I expect it will be used in the future to
> add new features like:
>
> Advanced Replication
> Point-in-time recovery
> Row reuse without vacuum
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
> pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
> + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
> + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/search.mpl
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2001-04-28 12:15:28 | WAL performance with wal_sync_method = open_sync |
| Previous Message | Mike Mascari | 2001-04-28 06:08:47 | RE: Re: Any optimizations to the join code in 7.1? |