| From: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Refactoring speculative insertion with unique indexes a little |
| Date: | 2016-09-27 08:25:01 |
| Message-ID: | 9cd58b00-99e5-e2ac-9d0e-2a697bd023ef@iki.fi |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 09/27/2016 11:22 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> wrote:
>> Hmm, yeah, that'd be nice to fix. I'd like to see a patch specifically to
>> fix that. I'm not convinced that we need all the complications of this
>> patch, to get that fixed. (In particular, indexam's still wouldn't need to
>> care about the different between CHECK_UNIQUE_PARTIAL and
>> CHECK_UNIQUE_SPECULATIVE, I think.)
>
> But you are convinced that everything else I describe would do it?
I didn't think very hard about it, but yeah, think so..
- Heikki
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2016-09-27 08:38:23 | Re: Refactoring speculative insertion with unique indexes a little |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2016-09-27 08:22:20 | Re: Refactoring speculative insertion with unique indexes a little |