From: | "Erwan DUROSELLE" <EDuroselle(at)seafrance(dot)fr> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Rp. : Mailing list question |
Date: | 2002-11-27 09:28:29 |
Message-ID: | 9c5d52bd8044dd428613f5dfc8d58b803de491cc@ |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
I have the same problem.
AFAIK, this is not the usual behaviour for mailing lists.
Erwan
>>> Jean-Christian Imbeault <jc(at)mega-bucks(dot)co(dot)jp> 11/27 7:35 >>>
Silly questions really but ...
#1 all the messages I receive from the GENERAL mailing list have the
To:
field set to be the original poster, CC: set to the ML address, and
there is no Reply-To: field set ... is this normal?
The reason I ask is that I find myself sometimes replying to a ML
message and sending my reply to the individual rather than the ML ...
In
order to avoid this I have to hit reply-all and delete the OP's address
... a bit annoying.
Or is is standard ML practice/etiquette that I should send replies to
both the ML *and* OP?
Thanks!
Jc
---------------------------(end of
broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to
majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Luis Sousa | 2002-11-27 10:05:24 | Re: SQL query help! |
Previous Message | Damjan Pipan | 2002-11-27 08:38:45 | Re: modifying new tuple on insert in c trigger |