Re: RFC: Logging plan of the running query

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
To: torikoshia <torikoshia(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RFC: Logging plan of the running query
Date: 2021-08-10 15:21:11
Message-ID: 9c4d9da6-48a5-fa18-4bff-f8eb0d4c9787@oss.nttdata.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2021/08/10 21:22, torikoshia wrote:
> I have updated the patch in this way.

Thanks for updating the patch!

> In this patch, getting the plan to the DO statement is as follows.

Looks good to me.

> Any thoughts?

+ ereport(LOG_SERVER_ONLY,
+ (errmsg("plan of the query running on backend with PID %d is:\n%s",
+ MyProcPid, es->str->data),
+ errhidestmt(true)));

Shouldn't we hide context information by calling errhidecontext(true)?

While "make installcheck" regression test was running, I repeated
executing pg_log_current_query_plan() and got the failure of join_hash test
with the following diff. This means that pg_log_current_query_plan() could
cause the query that should be completed successfully to fail with the error.
Isn't this a bug?

I *guess* that the cause of this issue is that ExplainNode() can call
InstrEndLoop() more than once unexpectedly.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$$
select count(*) from simple r join simple s using (id);
$$);
- initially_multibatch | increased_batches
-----------------------+-------------------
- f | f
-(1 row)
-
+ERROR: InstrEndLoop called on running node
+CONTEXT: PL/pgSQL function hash_join_batches(text) line 6 at FOR over EXECUTE statement
rollback to settings;
-- parallel with parallel-oblivious hash join
savepoint settings;
@@ -687,11 +684,9 @@
left join (select b1.id, b1.t from join_bar b1 join join_bar b2 using (id)) ss
on join_foo.id < ss.id + 1 and join_foo.id > ss.id - 1;
$$);
- multibatch
-------------
- t
-(1 row)
-
+ERROR: InstrEndLoop called on running node
+CONTEXT: parallel worker
+PL/pgSQL function hash_join_batches(text) line 6 at FOR over EXECUTE statement
rollback to settings;
-- single-batch with rescan, parallel-aware
savepoint settings;
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-08-10 15:21:28 Re: Why does the owner of a publication need CREATE privileges on the database?
Previous Message Mark Dilger 2021-08-10 15:16:35 Re: Another regexp performance improvement: skip useless paren-captures