| From: | "Gustavo Tonini" <gustavotonini(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "pgsql-hackers list" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Slony-I for circular replication |
| Date: | 2006-04-01 19:14:23 |
| Message-ID: | 9c31dd0d0604011114h4c90ffecsf38a1f9c6645a857@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Ozsu show us some solution for the problem in the book "Principles of
distributed database systems".
On 4/1/06, D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy(at)druid(dot)net> wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Mar 2006 17:57:25 -0300
> "Gustavo Tonini" <gustavotonini(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > why there's no way to make multi-master replication generic?
>
> Well, that's the material for a paper but the simplest example I can
> suggest is serial. How do multiple machines insert into a database
> table with a sequential primary key?
>
> --
> D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy(at)druid(dot)net> | Democracy is three wolves
> http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on
> +1 416 425 1212 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Fuhr | 2006-04-01 21:10:29 | Re: Postgres dies when using an intarray operator |
| Previous Message | Volkan YAZICI | 2006-04-01 18:39:44 | libpq Describe Extension [WAS: Bytea and perl] |