Re: postgres 11 issue?

From: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
To: Steve Rogerson <steve(dot)pg(at)yewtc(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: postgres 11 issue?
Date: 2019-06-06 22:37:58
Message-ID: 9c24dd63-46f1-3686-1f92-431aa0ae4f70@aklaver.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 6/6/19 8:12 AM, Steve Rogerson wrote:
> On 06/06/2019 14:35, Adrian Klaver wrote:

>
> Ok - on it's way - in the mean time - what does "record type has not been
> registered" mean?

Difficult to be definitive without knowing what "timestamp" actually is.
A vague answer is that whatever you defined "timestamp" as is not being
found.

>
>
> Steve
>

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Bilek 2019-06-06 23:51:02 RE: Requirement PA-DSS 1.1.4
Previous Message David Rowley 2019-06-06 22:00:28 Re: Table partition with primary key in 11.3