From: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Extend ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES for large objects |
Date: | 2025-01-22 12:30:17 |
Message-ID: | 9c0c4d7881d2450baf70edb0ae95415a81ac8cb1.camel@cybertec.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2024-09-13 at 16:18 +0900, Yugo Nagata wrote:
> I've attached a updated patch. The test is rewritten using has_largeobject_privilege()
> function instead of calling loread & lowrite, which makes the test a bit simpler.
> Thare are no other changes.
When I tried to apply this patch, I found that it doesn't apply any
more since commit f391d9dc93 renamed tab-complete.c to tab-complete.in.c.
Attached is a rebased patch.
I agree that large objects are a feature that should fade out (alas,
the JDBC driver still uses it for BLOBs). But this patch is not big
or complicated and is unlikely to create a big maintenance burden.
So I am somewhat for committing it. It works as advertised.
If you are fine with my rebased patch, I can mark it as "ready for
committer". If it actually gets committed depends on whether there
is a committer who thinks it worth the effort or not.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v4-0001-Extend-ALTER-DEFAULT-PRIVILEGES-for-large-objects.patch | text/x-patch | 19.3 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Japin Li | 2025-01-22 12:37:44 | Re: [RFC] Lock-free XLog Reservation from WAL |
Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2025-01-22 11:58:18 | Re: Add RESPECT/IGNORE NULLS and FROM FIRST/LAST options |