Re: locale & glibc 2.2.2

Tom Lane wrote:

> teg(at)redhat(dot)com (Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?=) writes:
>> Of course not, it's not a bug - if this is a problem, it's a bug in
>> Postgresql:
>
> If glibc 2.2.2 sorts that way in C locale, then glibc is broken.
> But I assume you meant this is the behavior in some other locale.
>
> Postgres as such can cope just fine with non-C sort orders, but it
> seems quite possible that the koi8 regression test sample outputs were
> constructed using C-locale sort rules. Since the original complainant
> merely asserted those tests were broken without defining what he meant
> by broken, we're pretty much wasting our time speculating...
>
> regards, tom lane

i'm really sorry!!!

problem was because of glibc upgrade.
where is no "ru_RU.KOI8-R" locale in glibc 2.2.2 and i changed it to "ru".
the database was initdb'ed with former locale and thus PG was unable to use
ru_RU.KOI8-R....

re-initdb just solved the problem

sorry once again!