Re: behaviour change - default_tablesapce + partition table

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: behaviour change - default_tablesapce + partition table
Date: 2019-05-21 03:00:36
Message-ID: 9bf4476c-c90e-b2c9-acd3-08e650efa2b4@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019/05/21 11:29, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2019-May-20, Amit Langote wrote:
>
>> Should we add this to open items?
>
> Yeah. I'm AFK this week, but can handle it afterwards. The fix already
> missed beta1, so I don't think there's a problem with taking a little
> bit longer.

OK, added.

Thanks,
Amit

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-05-21 03:15:47 Re: Parallel Append subplan order instability on aye-aye
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2019-05-21 02:41:08 Re: VACUUM fails to parse 0 and 1 as boolean value