Re: Storing sensor data

From: Ivan Voras <ivoras(at)freebsd(dot)org>
To: Kenneth Marshall <ktm(at)rice(dot)edu>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Storing sensor data
Date: 2009-05-28 15:24:33
Message-ID: 9bbcef730905280824i514bbe91vaa567a7be4e78cbb@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

2009/5/28 Kenneth Marshall <ktm(at)rice(dot)edu>:

>
> One big benefit of partitioning is that you can prune old data with
> minimal impact to the running system. Doing a large bulk delete would
> be extremely I/O impacting without partion support. We use this for
> a DB log system and it allows us to simply truncate a day table instead
> of a delete -- much, much faster.

Thanks. I'll need to investigate how much administrative overhead and
fragility partitioning will introduce since the data will also be
replicated between 2 servers (I'm thinking of using Slony). Any
experience with this combination?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Staubo 2009-05-28 15:34:18 Re: Storing sensor data
Previous Message Ivan Voras 2009-05-28 15:06:31 Re: Storing sensor data