From: | Jacob Champion <jchampion(at)timescale(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Sergey Dudoladov <sergey(dot)dudoladov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Introduce "log_connection_stages" setting. |
Date: | 2023-03-02 23:02:18 |
Message-ID: | 9b944c52-85d9-bc1d-99f1-35d9eaef1bfb@timescale.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/2/23 14:56, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jacob Champion <jchampion(at)timescale(dot)com> writes:
>> If I've understood Tom correctly in [1], both of these guc_mallocs
>> should be using a loglevel less than ERROR, to avoid forcing a
>> postmaster exit when out of memory. (I used WARNING in that thread
>> instead, which seemed to be acceptable.)
>
> Actually, preferred practice is as seen in e.g. check_datestyle:
>
> myextra = (int *) guc_malloc(LOG, 2 * sizeof(int));
> if (!myextra)
> return false;
> myextra[0] = newDateStyle;
> myextra[1] = newDateOrder;
> *extra = (void *) myextra;
>
> which gives the guc.c functions an opportunity to manage the
> failure.
Ah, thanks for the correction. (My guc_strdup(WARNING, ...) calls may
need to be cleaned up too, then.)
--Jacob
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2023-03-02 23:24:50 | Re: Memory leak from ExecutorState context? |
Previous Message | Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais | 2023-03-02 22:57:21 | Re: Memory leak from ExecutorState context? |