Re: Something is rotten in publication drop

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Something is rotten in publication drop
Date: 2017-06-20 14:17:02
Message-ID: 9b09264a-ff67-23da-218b-9f929d561aff@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 6/19/17 21:57, Tom Lane wrote:
> but while eyeballing it I started to wonder
> why in the world is pg_get_publication_tables marked prosecdef?
> If that has any consequences at all, they're probably bad.
> There are exactly no other built-in functions that have that set.

That was quite likely a mistake. I've fixed it.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2017-06-20 14:36:43 Re: Broken hint bits (freeze)
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2017-06-20 13:54:41 Re: Broken hint bits (freeze)