From: | "Gordon Runkle" <gar(at)integrated-dynamics(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: How much log space does VACUUM need? |
Date: | 2001-04-09 23:42:21 |
Message-ID: | 9atgv9$gh3$1@news.tht.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
In article <7843(dot)986599087(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
wrote:
> Not sure if that should be construed as a bug or not; Vadim will have to
> answer that. But here's a thought: try increasing CHECKPOINT_TIMEOUT
> and/or CHECKPOINT_SEGMENTS so that you don't get intermediate
> checkpoints while the vacuum proceeds. Should reduce the thing's
> appetite for log space ...
Thanks Tom. I didn't get to do anything with this until
today -- the power supply on that box fried (at least
the 12V side did), during a COPY. I'm running ext2 as
the filesystem and even so, things came right up after
I fixed the box. So, I'm happy with PostgreSQL's recovery
ability! It's WAL worth the effort you put into it.
Sorry, it just came to me and I typed before I thought...
Gordon.
--
It doesn't get any easier, you just go faster.
-- Greg LeMond
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Homayoun Yousefi'zadeh | 2001-04-09 23:43:03 | Re: JDBC and Perl compiling problems w/ postgresql-7.1rc4 |
Previous Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2001-04-09 23:33:37 | Re: table level locking vs. row level (or whatever PSQL uses) |