| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Jelte Fennema <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Jesse Zhang <sbjesse(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner |
| Date: | 2023-10-29 14:22:27 |
| Message-ID: | 9af5e9e7-b5e8-c761-33d0-453c660e8fca@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2023-10-28 Sa 12:09, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> Based on recent experience, where a lot koel's recent complaints seem to
>> be about comments, I'd like to suggest a modest adjustment.
>> First, we should provide a mode of pgindent that doesn't reflow
>> comments. pg_bsd_indent has a flag for this (-nfcb), so this should be
>> relatively simple. Second, koel could use that mode, so that it
>> wouldn't complain about comments it thinks need to be reflowed. Of
>> course, we'd fix these up with our regular pgindent runs.
> Seems like a bit of a kluge. Maybe it's the right thing to do, but
> I don't think we have enough data points yet to be confident that
> it'd meaningfully reduce the number of breakages.
>
> On a more abstract level: the point of trying to maintain indent
> cleanliness is so that if you modify a file and then want to run
> pgindent on your own changes, you don't get incidental changes
> elsewhere in the file. This solution would break that, so I'm
> not sure it isn't throwing the baby out with the bathwater.
Yeah, could be.
cheers
andrew.
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2023-10-29 14:30:54 | Re: Issues with Information_schema.views |
| Previous Message | jian he | 2023-10-29 11:53:29 | Re: Issues with Information_schema.views |