From: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeevan Ladhe <jeevan(dot)ladhe(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Adding support for Default partition in partitioning |
Date: | 2017-06-15 06:48:55 |
Message-ID: | 9ad4a1ae-e71b-4e6e-7b8c-e4ba1b8b9c8e@lab.ntt.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2017/06/15 4:51, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 8:02 AM, Jeevan Ladhe
> <jeevan(dot)ladhe(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>> Here are the details of the patches in attached zip.
>> 0001. refactoring existing ATExecAttachPartition code so that it can be
>> used for
>> default partitioning as well
>> 0002. support for default partition with the restriction of preventing
>> addition
>> of any new partition after default partition.
>> 0003. extend default partitioning support to allow addition of new
>> partitions.
>> 0004. extend default partitioning validation code to reuse the refactored
>> code
>> in patch 0001.
>
> I think the core ideas of this patch are pretty solid now. It's come
> a long way in the last month.
+1
BTW, I noticed the following in 0002:
@@ -1322,15 +1357,59 @@ get_qual_for_list(PartitionKey key,
PartitionBoundSpec *spec)
[ ... ]
+ oldcxt = MemoryContextSwitchTo(CacheMemoryContext);
I'm not sure if we need to do that. Can you explain?
Thanks,
Amit
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Langote | 2017-06-15 07:01:53 | Re: Adding support for Default partition in partitioning |
Previous Message | Petr Jelinek | 2017-06-15 06:41:16 | Re: Refreshing subscription relation state inside a transaction block |