Re: Can we go beyond the standard to make Postgres radically better?

From: Rob Sargent <robjsargent(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Can we go beyond the standard to make Postgres radically better?
Date: 2022-02-11 16:42:02
Message-ID: 9ab43f62-326a-d4a9-db5d-ae9f01ce0e21@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 2/11/22 09:12, Mladen Gogala wrote:
> On 2/11/22 09:48, Benedict Holland wrote:
>> So to summarize, people are bad programmers who refuse to learn SQL
>> So SQL is the problem? Common. You cannot bring that to a postgres
>> list serve.
>>
>> Look. It's not perfect. It's a pain. It is hard to generate queries
>> (oh my God why are you doing this?) and it's hard to work with. You
>> are describing c++ to Python programmers and arguing why no one
>> should ever use c++. And look, there are other languages that are way
>> better like Python. So why would anyone ever chose c++?
>>
> There is probably a misunderstanding here. I haven't talked about
> people, I leave that to politicians. Second, I was defending SQL.
> You've got me confused with somebody else. Last but not least, I
> didn't bring anything to this list, I was just responding to the posts.
>
>
Can we get back to discussing the code of conduct now?

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Raymond Brinzer 2022-02-11 19:30:09 Re: Can we go beyond the standard to make Postgres radically better?
Previous Message Mladen Gogala 2022-02-11 16:12:34 Re: Can we go beyond the standard to make Postgres radically better?