Re: Packages: Again

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Packages: Again
Date: 2017-01-11 20:56:39
Message-ID: 9aa56753-ea61-90d7-8df1-1a1d1b5e781d@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 01/11/2017 11:32 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
>
> We have a schemas instead - the PostgreSQL schema is close to Oracle
> packages.

No. It isn't.

A Package is essentially a class with dependencies. It has nothing to do
with schemas outside of being named qualified. For example:

https://docs.oracle.com/cd/B19306_01/appdev.102/b14261/packages.htm#i4362

JD

--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
+1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.
Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-01-11 20:57:25 Re: merging some features from plpgsql2 project
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2017-01-11 20:48:53 Re: pg_restore accepts -j -1