Re: Unicode normalization SQL functions

From: Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Unicode normalization SQL functions
Date: 2020-03-19 17:01:12
Message-ID: 9a8d5981-ca84-c012-ca77-6617f6d55f96@proxel.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 3/19/20 3:41 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> What is that status of this patch set?  I think we have nailed down the
> behavior, but there were some concerns about certain performance
> characteristics.  Do people feel that those are required to be addressed
> in this cycle?

Personally I would rather see it merged if the code is correct (which it
seems like it is from what I can tell) as the performance seems to be
good enough for it to be useful.

Unicode normalization is a feature which I have wished and at least for
my use cases the current implementation is more than fast enough.

Andreas

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2020-03-19 17:59:02 Re: Missing errcode() in ereport
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2020-03-19 16:38:40 Re: Internal key management system