| From: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: stress test for parallel workers |
| Date: | 2019-08-07 16:08:04 |
| Message-ID: | 9a54195b-d9b2-192c-814c-b323967655b6@iki.fi |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 07/08/2019 17:45, Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> writes:
>> On 07/08/2019 16:57, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Also, if you're using systemd or something else that thinks it
>>> ought to interfere with where cores get dropped, that could be
>>> a problem.
>
>> I think they should just go to a file called "core", I don't think I've
>> changed any settings related to it, at least. I tried "find / -name
>> core*", but didn't find any core files, though.
>
> On Linux machines the first thing to check is
>
> cat /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern
>
> On a Debian machine I have handy, that just says "core", but Red Hat
> tends to mess with it ...
It's just "core" on chipmunk, too.
- Heikki
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Geoff Winkless | 2019-08-07 16:13:23 | Re: s/rewinded/rewound/? |
| Previous Message | Chapman Flack | 2019-08-07 15:59:49 | Re: is necessary to recheck cached data in fn_extra? |