From: | Jürgen Purtz <juergen(at)purtz(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Change JOIN tutorial to focus more on explicit joins |
Date: | 2020-11-30 20:15:11 |
Message-ID: | 9a3ce766-81e9-aa13-3cf3-793e52375df8@purtz.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
On 30.11.20 20:45, Anastasia Lubennikova wrote:
> As far as I see something got committed and now the discussion is stuck in arguing about parenthesis.
> FWIW, I think it is a matter of personal taste. Maybe we can compromise on simply leaving this part unchanged.
With or without parenthesis is a little more than a personal taste, but
it's a very tiny detail. I'm happy with either of the two variants.
--
J. Purtz
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2020-11-30 20:25:58 | Re: Change JOIN tutorial to focus more on explicit joins |
Previous Message | Anastasia Lubennikova | 2020-11-30 19:45:31 | Re: Change JOIN tutorial to focus more on explicit joins |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Anastasia Lubennikova | 2020-11-30 20:21:19 | Re: [patch] [doc] Introduce view updating options more succinctly |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2020-11-30 20:05:43 | Re: [DOC] Document concurrent index builds waiting on each other |