From: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | "James Pang (chaolpan)" <chaolpan(at)cisco(dot)com>, "pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: autovacuum default run with vacuum_index_cleanup and vacuum_truncate and related lock? |
Date: | 2022-02-07 16:09:20 |
Message-ID: | 9a196c5db21caadb873493439011e4959d387ffe.camel@cybertec.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Mon, 2022-02-07 at 08:43 +0000, James Pang (chaolpan) wrote:
> It’s Postgres 13 version, we plan to migrate from Oracle to Postgres 13 on RHEL8.
> One maintain job is about autovacuum, with default config, autovacuum will do on
> tables with “vacuum_index_cleanup” and “vacuum_truncate” option?
> With both options, autovacuum woker will hold “access exclusive” lock when truncate
> empty blocks and cleanup index ? if that’s true, how to handle autovacuum to reduce
> the lock blocking issue?
Cleaning up the index will not take any locks that block data modifications.
The ACCESS EXCLUSIVE lock for truncation is only held for a very short time
and won't bother you (unless perhaps, you could get replication conflicts on
a standby server).
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
--
Cybertec | https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Axel Rau | 2022-02-07 17:00:01 | Re: restarting logical replication after upgrading standby |
Previous Message | Dan Smith | 2022-02-07 13:14:30 | Re: [Help][Service not coming-up] |