Re: Are pgrpm changes for JDBC discussed here before submission?

Hi Dave,

Well, *building* RPMs are PITA nowadays, so until we get a stable build, I would prefer this list to catch your attention.

Regards, Devrim

On December 30, 2015 6:20:40 PM GMT+02:00, Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> wrote:
>Hi John,
>
>We don't have anything to do with the RPMS
>
>Dave
>
>Dave Cramer
>
>davec(at)postgresintl(dot)com
>www.postgresintl.com
>
>On 30 December 2015 at 11:03, John Harvey <john(dot)harvey(at)crunchydata(dot)com>
>wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I have created some changes to the pgrpm repository (git://
>> git.postgresql.org/git/pgrpms.git) in order to support the maven
>changes
>> that went into PGJDBC REL9.4.1207. The changes allow for the proper
>> generation of RPMS for RHEL6 / 7. Before I submit the changes to
>pgrpm, I
>> was wondering if those changes are discussed in the community here,
>or if
>> they're discussed solely with the team that works on the pgrpm
>repository?
>>
>> I'd be more than happy to share my changes here if it's worth a
>discussion.
>>
>> Regards,
>> -John
>>

--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.