| From: | Alex Rice <alrice(at)ARCplanning(dot)com> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> | 
| Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org | 
| Subject: | Re: 2 simple SQL questions: optimizing aggegate query | 
| Date: | 2003-05-05 20:03:18 | 
| Message-ID: | 9D0F6008-7F34-11D7-977E-000393529642@ARCplanning.com | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-sql | 
On Monday, May 5, 2003, at 01:45  PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>> SELECT url.rec_id, url, title, content_type, txt,
>> sum(
>>   case
>>    when dict.word = 'wordx' then 1
>>    when dict.word = 'wordx' then 1
>>    when dict.word = 'wordy' then 1
>>    else 0
>>   end
>> ) as rank
>> FROM dict, url
>> WHERE url.rec_id = dict.url_id
>> GROUP BY rec_id, url, title, content_type, txt
>> ORDER BY rank DESC
>
> Is there some reason you can't put the word list in the where clause?
> (You can use coalesce to set NULL sums to 0.)
Can you give an example of what you mean use coalesce and how to use it 
to produce a count of the matched words, the rank?
I am converting some existing query examples that use the form
SUM( dict.word IN ( word list...))
which doesn't work with pgsql.
I got the idea for the case statement from this archive message
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-sql/1999-10/msg00136.php
Thanks much,
Alex Rice, Software Developer
Architectural Research Consultants, Inc.
alrice(at)ARCplanning(dot)com
alrice(at)swcp(dot)com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Achilleus Mantzios | 2003-05-05 20:24:05 | Re: UNICODE and SQL | 
| Previous Message | Michael A Nachbaur | 2003-05-05 19:57:16 | pgsql Replication Proxy (was Re: Replication for a large database) |