Re: Different compression methods for FPI

From: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Different compression methods for FPI
Date: 2021-06-28 08:01:00
Message-ID: 9C189C4C-167E-47B5-8E95-F57CFBECD0D8@yandex-team.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> 28 июня 2021 г., в 12:36, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> написал(а):
>
> Removing "allows_streaming => 1" in 011_crash_recovery.pl is enough to
> make the test fail on HEAD. And the test fails equally without or
> without any changes related to wal_compression, so adding or removing
> options to wal_compression is not going to change anything with that.
> There is simply no relationship I can spot, though I may be missing of
> course an argument here.
There is no relationship at all. That test 011_crash_recovery.pl is failing depending on random fluctuation in WAL size. Currently, it does not affect this thread anyhow (except for confusion I made by importing patch with fix from other thread, sorry).

> Let's just discuss this recovery issue where
> it should be discussed (these are patches 0002 and 0003 in the patch
> v9 sent upthread):
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20210308.173242.463790587797836129.horikyota.ntt%40gmail.com
+1.

Best regards, Andrey Borodin.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabien COELHO 2021-06-28 08:13:11 Re: Overflow hazard in pgbench
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2021-06-28 07:53:28 Re: Different compression methods for FPI