From: | Greg Stark <greg(dot)stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Assert Levels |
Date: | 2008-09-19 17:50:32 |
Message-ID: | 9BF691D4-C386-4FA3-BA48-D2426E9B3B71@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
greg
On 19 Sep 2008, at 13:20, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> Can we introduce levels of assertion?
>
> The thing that is good about Assert() is that it doesn't require a lot
> of programmer effort to put one in. I'm not in favor of complexifying
> it.
>
Perhaps just an Assert_expensive() would be useful if someone wants to
to the work of going through all the assertions and determining if
they're especially expensive. We already have stuff like CLOBBER*.
You'll also have to do enough empirical tests to convince people that
a --enable-cheap-casserts build really does perform the same as a
regular build.
> regards, tom lane
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David E. Wheeler | 2008-09-19 18:05:36 | Re: Where to Host Project |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2008-09-19 17:42:18 | Re: Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches (for CommitFest:Sep) |