Re: psql - improve test coverage from 41% to 88%

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
Subject: Re: psql - improve test coverage from 41% to 88%
Date: 2020-07-30 21:47:23
Message-ID: 9BA3E91D-4DFE-4B51-A31F-D3F55BAAF243@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 5 Jul 2020, at 13:38, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
>
>> On 24 Mar 2020, at 15:47, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:
>
>> This patch no longer applies: http://cfbot.cputube.org/patch_27_2262.log
>>
>> CF entry has been updated to Waiting on Author.
>
> This patch hasn't been updated and still doesn't apply, do you intend to rebase
> it during this commitfest or should we move it to returned with feedback? It
> can always be re-opened at a later date.

As the thread has stalled, I've marked this Returned with Feedback.

cheers ./daniel

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2020-07-30 21:52:04 Re: Identifying user-created objects
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-07-30 21:42:19 Re: Missing CFI in hlCover()?