Re: Let's Do the CoC Right

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>
To: Rajeev Bhatta <techie(dot)rajeev(at)yahoo(dot)in>
Cc: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>, Josh Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Let's Do the CoC Right
Date: 2016-01-22 18:44:05
Message-ID: 9B8691EC-D87E-424B-A32F-17DA449447E2@justatheory.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Jan 22, 2016, at 10:35 AM, Rajeev Bhatta <techie(dot)rajeev(at)yahoo(dot)in> wrote:

> Any process or change is perfected over course of time.. The current CoC may not be perfect but time will make it.

It is better than none, I’ll grant you, but it could be SOOO much better right now.

> Ideas can be solicited from other groups but CoC should be created and enforced by our community alone…

It’s fair to draw on the experience and expertise of others who have gone before us, yes.

>> BTW, I am one of those “through someone else” people of which you speak.
>
> I am sorry to hear that... The fact that you are raising your opinion shows your passion for postgres project which is very appreciated and I hope if there are others they should be back and see that there is an effort to minimize the ill treatment they had to suffer.

Oh, no doubt, but the fact that they’re not participating (or barely) shows that the current proposal is insufficient.

Best,

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rajeev Bhatta 2016-01-22 18:48:48 Re: Let's Do the CoC Right
Previous Message David E. Wheeler 2016-01-22 18:41:52 Re: Let's Do the CoC Right