From: | Jeremy Buchmann <jeremy(at)wellsgaming(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Florin Andrei <florin(at)sgi(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: optimizing for fast INSERTs |
Date: | 2001-12-06 02:04:40 |
Message-ID: | 9B5DC04E-E9ED-11D5-8C0F-000502E740BA@wellsgaming.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Wednesday, December 5, 2001, at 02:58 PM, Florin Andrei wrote:
> After running several tests with PostgreSQL-7.1.3 versus some other
> opensourced SQL servers, i was very pleased by its performance when it
> comes to SELECTs on multiple large tables.
> But there's a problem: if i use PostgreSQL as a SQL backend for Snort,
> running Snort as a network sniffer and logging all relevant information
> about IP packets into the database, i see a lot of packet drops.
> Basically, once the traffic is higher that a certain limit, and once
> PostgreSQL starts eating up 100% CPU time, it starts missing packets.
> Snort is using just one database, and has several tables in it; each
> table has 5...10 columns, each column is an integer type. In this SQL
> structure, Snort is doing a lot of INSERTs, very fast.
> In these conditions, i need to make PostgreSQL as fast as it can be.
Logging packets is a tough job for a database...I can only think
of two things:
1) Instead of logging directly to the database, log to a plain text file
and then
periodically run a separate program which pulls records from that file
into
the database.
2) Dig through the Snort source code and see if you can pool writes by
using a transaction...though that may not help your CPU overhead problem.
--Jeremy
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Morten Sickel | 2001-12-06 12:51:46 | Time zone setting |
Previous Message | Florin Andrei | 2001-12-05 22:58:57 | optimizing for fast INSERTs |