libpq.so.4

From: Oliver Kohll <oliver(at)gtwm(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: libpq.so.4
Date: 2008-06-08 10:55:45
Message-ID: 9B10C2AA-3669-4362-A16F-4DBDD2B100F7@gtwm.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hello,

I have the same issue as this poster with libpq.so.4:
http://www.nabble.com/8.3.0-upgrade-td16093803.html

In short, I've upgraded to 8.3.1 from 8.1 on RHEL 4 (with some CentOS
packages). I have apps with dependencies of libpq.so.4 but this is no
longer available. 8.3.1 provides libpq.so.5 and the compat-libs
provide libpq.so.3.

At the moment maintaining package management integrity is not a must -
getting back to 100% package-controlled files can wait until the
machine is replaced. Upgrading the dependent software is not an option.
With that in mind, any suggestions on options?

What I've thought of trying so far is
1) creating a symlink called libpq.so.4 towards libpq.so.5 - slightly
dangerous due to possible API changes?
2) extracting a copy of libpq.so.4 from the previous RPM release of
postgres and manually uploading it
3) building a custom compat package - I don't know how to do this
though.

but I'm unaware of the pros and cons of these.

Any comments appreciated.

Regards
Oliver

oliver(at)gtwm(dot)co(dot)uk / 0845 456 1810 / 07814 828608
www.gtwm.co.uk - company
www.gtportalbase.com - product

NOTE
No contracts may be concluded on behalf of GT webMarque by means of e-
mail
communications. The contents of this e-mail are confidential to the
intended recipient at the e-mail address to which it has been addressed;
it may not be disclosed to or used by anyone other than this addressee,
nor may it be copied in any way. If received in error please return to
sender via e-mail.

DISCLAIMER
Please note that neither GT webMarque Ltd nor the sender accept any
responsibility for viruses transmitted via e-mail. It is your
responsibility to scan attachments (if any).

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jaime Casanova 2008-06-08 13:55:48 Re: temporarily deactivate an index
Previous Message Gurjeet Singh 2008-06-08 08:05:34 Re: when to reindex?