From: | Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)myrealbox(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paesold <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Interval aggregate regression failure (expected seems |
Date: | 2006-06-23 00:53:31 |
Message-ID: | 9AE36A0D-5708-46CD-B6CE-332DFFCDD088@seespotcode.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Jun 23, 2006, at 9:47 , Michael Glaesemann wrote:
> It also changes the result of the aggregate test for intervals, but
> I think that's to be expected.
My goodness. Of course it changes the aggregate test results. That
was what brought this up in the first place. (*kicks self for not
reading the subject line when responding*)
Michael Glaesemann
grzm seespotcode net
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2006-06-23 01:17:32 | Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-06-23 00:49:35 | Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2006-06-23 01:51:38 | Re: Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2 |
Previous Message | Michael Glaesemann | 2006-06-23 00:47:13 | Re: Interval aggregate regression failure (expected seems |