| From: | Guido Neitzer <lists(at)event-s(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Gabriele <gabriele_palma(at)tin(dot)it>, Postgresql General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PostGreSQL Replication |
| Date: | 2007-07-10 16:52:04 |
| Message-ID: | 9A838AE3-7EE8-4A6A-8B1D-90A0B4DD2541@event-s.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 07.07.2007, at 06:16, Gabriele wrote:
> Let's have a server which feed data to multiple slaves, usually using
> direct online connections. Now, we may want to allow those client to
> sync the data to a local replica, work offline and then resync the
> data back to the server. Which is the easiest way to approach this
> problem?
I don't know anything for PostgreSQL doing that.
FrontBase [1] might have something like that if I understood Geert
correctly. But I'm not sure about that. Maybe you ask them directly.
There DBMS is free but not open source though.
cug
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nykolyn, Andrew | 2007-07-10 17:17:48 | Re: Nested Transactions in PL/pgSQL |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2007-07-10 16:45:49 | Re: Vaccum Stalling |