From: | Marko Karppinen <marko(at)karppinen(dot)fi> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Tablespaces |
Date: | 2004-03-08 00:07:35 |
Message-ID: | 9A79CD2E-7094-11D8-8995-000A95C56374@karppinen.fi |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 |
On 3 March 2004, at 19:52, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> The advantage of symlinks is that an administrator could see how things
> are laid out from the command line.
One thing to keep in mind is that system administrators don't see
symlinks as being informational -- they see them as the actual UI
for the redirection in question. So their expectation is that they'll
be able to move the actual directory around at will (as long as they
update the symlink to match).
If symlinks are used, the rule of least surprise would mean that
no information whatsoever about the physical location of a tablespace
should be stored in the system catalogs. Otherwise their relationship
with the information stored in the symlink is ambiguous.
mk
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Matthew T. O'Connor | 2004-03-08 00:48:01 | Re: 7.4.2 ... all commits in? |
Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2004-03-07 23:48:37 | Re: Slony-I makes progress |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Claudio Natoli | 2004-03-08 09:52:11 | Re: Win32 regression test status |
Previous Message | Claudio Natoli | 2004-03-07 23:28:29 | Re: APC + socket restrictions under Win32? |