From: | Anne Rosset <arosset(at)collab(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Performance with the new security release? |
Date: | 2013-04-22 18:06:31 |
Message-ID: | 9A6B86D66BD3C2438AFACFA09354890F20A2A8A1@EXCH01.sp.corp.collab.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Josh,
Thanks for your reply.
I don't think this is the case since we are using jboss/jdbc driver with a connection pool.
Thanks,
Anne
-----Original Message-----
From: Josh Berkus [mailto:josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 10:58 AM
To: Anne Rosset
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Performance with the new security release?
On 04/22/2013 10:38 AM, Anne Rosset wrote:
> While we are digging into this, I would like to know if it is
> possible that the release has some impact on performance. After
> reading this "It was created as a side effect of a refactoring effort
> to make establishing new connections to a PostgreSQL server faster,
> and the associated code more maintainable.", I am thinking it is quite possible.
Does your application do a lot of rapidfire reconnection to the database? As in hundreds of new connections per minute?
Mind you, if it does, I strongly recommend pgbouncer ...
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Миша Тюрин | 2013-04-22 18:22:44 | high io BUT huge amount of free memory |
Previous Message | Florian Pflug | 2013-04-22 18:04:47 | Re: Enabling Checksums |