Poor performance on an aggregate query

From: Anne Rosset <arosset(at)collab(dot)net>
To: "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Poor performance on an aggregate query
Date: 2013-04-15 20:59:50
Message-ID: 9A6B86D66BD3C2438AFACFA09354890F20A26DDE@EXCH01.sp.corp.collab.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Hi all,
I have this simple query that has performance issue. I am assuming there is something wrong in our configuration. Can someone point me to the right direction? (our work_mem is set to 64MB)

srdb=> explain analyze 013-04-15 16:51:20,223 INFO [com.vasoftware.sf.server.common.querygenerator.Query] (http--127.0.0.1-8080-11) Query: [Id: 4652] [duration: 51999][debug sql] SELECT
psrdb(> MAX(length(discussion_post.id)) AS maxLength
psrdb(> FROM
psrdb(> discussion_post discussion_post^C
psrdb=> explain analyze SELECT
psrdb-> MAX(length(discussion_post.id)) AS maxLength
psrdb-> FROM
psrdb-> discussion_post discussion_post
psrdb-> ;
QUERY PLAN
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aggregate (cost=10000043105.13..10000043105.14 rows=1 width=10) (actual time=52150.015..52150.015 rows=1 loops=1)
-> Seq Scan on discussion_post (cost=10000000000.00..10000041980.90 rows=449690 width=10) (actual time=0.006..51981.746 rows=449604 loops=1)
Total runtime: 52150.073 ms
(3 rows)

Thanks a lot,
Anne

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2013-04-15 21:04:43 Re: Poor performance on an aggregate query
Previous Message Jeff Janes 2013-04-15 20:16:17 Re: INDEX Performance Issue